Impact Learning Systems

Get to the HEART of Customer Service

Name: Peggy Carlaw

Web Site: http://about.me/peggycarlaw

Bio: Peggy Carlaw is the founder of Impact Learning Systems, a leading training company specializing in improving communications between front-line employees and customers. Peggy is co-author of several books published by McGraw-Hill, including Managing and Motivating Contact Center Employees and The Big Book of Sales Training Games.

Posts by :

    When to Use Customer Service Games in Training

    February 3rd, 2012

    Cus­tomer ser­vice games can add spice to a train­ing pro­gram. I ought to know, I wrote the book! Unfor­tu­nately, I've seen too many games used just because–well, I'm not sure why. The game was fun, but didn't increase learn­ing or help par­tic­i­pants per­form bet­ter on the job.

    Cus­tomer ser­vice games are fun, moti­va­tional activ­i­ties. The key is to use them in con­junc­tion with skill learn­ing and skill use. When rel­e­vant to par­tic­i­pants and their jobs, the games build con­fi­dence, lift morale, spark enthu­si­asm, stim­u­late cre­ativ­ity, and ulti­mately achieve results.

    Games can be quick, fun ener­giz­ers that raise par­tic­i­pants' aware­ness of cus­tomer ser­vice issues. Games can also be full-scale activ­i­ties that teach a skill and offer par­tic­i­pants the oppor­tu­nity to prac­tice the skill in an infor­mal, onthreat­en­ing environment.

    There are a num­ber of ways you can use cus­tomer ser­vice games: as stand-alone train­ing activ­i­ties, as warm-ups to a more inten­sive train­ing ses­sion, or in com­bi­na­tion with one another to con­sti­tute a seg­ments of a com­pre­hen­sive cus­tomer ser­vice train­ing event.

    Fol­low­ing are some resources for cus­tomer ser­vice game:

    And if you need to plan a more com­pre­hen­sive train­ing event, check out one of these:

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    No Comments "

    Tracking Customer-Focused Metrics

    January 17th, 2012

    For years, con­tact cen­ter man­agers have been mea­sur­ing oper­a­tional met­rics like aver­age han­dle time, aver­age hold time, turnover, sales per rep­re­sen­ta­tive, aver­age time to respond, and so on. But are these the most impor­tant met­rics to measure?

    What’s impor­tant to mea­sure depends on who you are

    Cus­tomer ser­vice and sup­port man­agers want to mea­sure the oper­a­tional met­rics listed above along with oth­ers like trans­fer rates and queue length to help them run an effi­cient organization.

    Exec­u­tives, on the other hand, want to mea­sure cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion, cus­tomer loy­alty, mar­ket share, and prof­itabil­ity by prod­uct or ser­vice line so they can see how effec­tive the com­pany is at max­i­miz­ing the shareholder’s return on invest­ment. The two do not always jive.

    The dis­con­nect between effi­cient and effective

    A com­pany could go out of busi­ness if their only con­cern is hav­ing happy cus­tomers at all costs. So while it’s impor­tant to be cost-effective, this doesn’t always mean seek­ing the low­est cost. Take for exam­ple, the usual focus on aver­age han­dle time. Of course, cus­tomers want to keep a call as short as pos­si­ble, too. But they care more about get­ting their ques­tions answered accu­rately and get­ting their prob­lems resolved.

    And guess what? Most cus­tomers don’t mind tak­ing a lit­tle extra time to hear about some­thing that will save them from hav­ing to call back in the future. So there’s a dis­con­nect between keep­ing a call short (effi­cient) and tak­ing enough time to resolve the caller’s issue and give infor­ma­tion to min­i­mize a call back (effective).

    To meet the goals of the exec­u­tive team, there’s a trend among cus­tomer ser­vice and sup­port man­agers to re-examine their met­rics in light of the larger objec­tives of the business.

    What is the customer’s point of view?

    Start exam­in­ing your met­rics from the customer’s point of view. Con­sider esca­la­tions, for exam­ple. Man­agers seek to drive esca­la­tions down. Of course! Who wants their super­vi­sors or Tier 2 engi­neers tied up on sim­ple prob­lems. But what will sat­isfy the cus­tomer? A speedy esca­la­tion if that’s what it takes to get the prob­lem resolved.

    A customer-focused met­ric then, would be to track "appro­pri­ate" vs. “inap­pro­pri­ate” esca­la­tions. Inap­pro­pri­ate esca­la­tions are those where the agent should be able to han­dle the prob­lem, but can’t, and there­fore esca­lates the cus­tomer to the next level. Too many inap­pro­pri­ate esca­la­tions point out a train­ing issue. Once you iden­tify inap­pro­pri­ate esca­la­tions as a prob­lem, you can then pro­vide addi­tional train­ing and give your staff the tools they need to han­dle their level of calls. The result will be fewer inap­pro­pri­ate esca­la­tions, hap­pier cus­tomers, and lower costs.

    How about call qual­ity scores? Many cen­ters we've worked with tracked behav­iors that did not affect cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion (such as using the customer’s name three times dur­ing the call) and left out things that did, (such as pro­vid­ing an accu­rate answer). Why not con­duct a focus group with cus­tomers this year to find out what you should add to your form and what you can stop tracking.

    What else should you track?

    There’s a real busi­ness case for first-contact res­o­lu­tion because it’s one of the prime dri­vers of cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion and it keeps costs down.

    As Richard Snow from Ven­tana Research puts it:

    First con­tact res­o­lu­tion can be even more use­ful when linked with other met­rics and actions. Applied to agents, for exam­ple, it lets com­pa­nies iden­tify best prac­tices and adjust process and train­ing so more agents can resolve more issues the first time. Linked to cus­tomers, it can tell who are the dif­fi­cult cus­tomers and how they can be han­dled in the future. It can help iden­tify why issues occur and what can be done to gen­er­ate fewer calls. It can influ­ence behav­ior, because agents will strive harder to resolve more calls at the first attempt. It can influ­ence call-routing rules, so that more calls are routed to agents who resolve more issues the first time.”

    If you have first con­tact res­o­lu­tion within bench­mark lev­els, then go for next issue avoid­ance, also called proac­tive ser­vice. This is another one of the top 10 trends for the upcom­ing year.

    Con­fer­ences, webi­nars, and cus­tomer ser­vice forums are all a-buzz about cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion, reten­tion, and net pro­moter scores—the same issues exec­u­tives pay atten­tion to. This year, be sure your cen­ter met­rics are well-aligned to deliver solid busi­ness results.

    Post #8 in the Top Ten Cus­tomer Ser­vice and Sup­port Trends for 2012 series. 

     

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    1 Comment "

    Upselling and Cross-selling by Customer Service and Support Teams

    January 16th, 2012

    As the econ­omy recov­ers, many com­pa­nies are look­ing for oppor­tu­ni­ties to claw their way back to pre-recession sales lev­els. And com­pa­nies that fared well want to be sure to keep their cus­tomers as com­pe­ti­tion in the play­ing field grows.

    Who’s upselling and cross-selling now?

    While sales teams have long had goals for upselling and cross-selling, more com­pa­nies than ever are ask­ing their cus­tomer ser­vice reps to do the same. And they’re ask­ing their sup­port engi­neers to  rec­om­mend prod­uct upgrades and con­tact cus­tomers to renew war­ranty agree­ments. This grow­ing trend is par­tic­u­larly true in the finan­cial ser­vices, telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions, high tech­nol­ogy, and ser­vices industries.

    Why is upselling and cross-selling an impor­tant trend for ser­vice and sup­port departments?

    Most indus­tries are deal­ing with the prob­lem of sell­ing a com­mod­ity, since com­peti­tors are able to quickly copy what was, orig­i­nally, an inno­v­a­tive prod­uct dif­fer­en­tia­tor. In fact, the Cor­po­rate Exec­u­tive Board in their ECSB Insider report 67 per­cent of busi­ness own­ers feel that more sup­pli­ers are now offer­ing com­pet­ing prod­ucts than five years ago. This makes new sales more dif­fi­cult and buy­ers less loyal since they have mul­ti­ple places where they can pur­chase sim­i­lar prod­ucts or ser­vices. While it's impor­tant to increase mar­ket share, it's also eas­ier to focus on your exist­ing buy­ers who already trust your orga­ni­za­tion and find value in your offer­ing. Plus, the more prod­ucts and ser­vices peo­ple buy from an orga­ni­za­tion, the more likely they are to remain engaged rather than take their busi­ness elsewhere.

    There’s a ben­e­fit for cus­tomers, too. Pur­chas­ing more at once saves them time and ship­ping costs, and maybe even money if there’s a quan­tity dis­count. Upgrad­ing to a new prod­uct ver­sion saves on repair costs. Pur­chas­ing a main­te­nance con­tract reduces risk, helps with bud­get­ing, and smooths cash flow.

    What’s required for success?

    Accord­ing to Mar­ket­Soft Cor­po­ra­tion, a provider of cross-selling tech­nol­ogy, nearly three quar­ters of all busi­nesses say they have cross-selling pro­grams, but as many as 70 per­cent of such efforts fail to increase rev­enue in any sig­nif­i­cant way. Why?

    Despite advance­ments in tech­nol­ogy to iden­tify sales oppor­tu­ni­ties through seg­men­ta­tion and behav­ior analy­sis, if the agents speak­ing with cus­tomers don’t want to sell or don’t intro­duce the sale in a way that ben­e­fits the buyer, there will be no sale.

    When pre­sented with an upsell and cross-sell ini­tia­tive, many cus­tomer ser­vice and sup­port rep­re­sen­ta­tives are not happy! They per­ceive them­selves as ser­vice pro­fes­sion­als, not sales­peo­ple. In fact, some com­pa­nies have lost as much as 25% of their depart­ment when embark­ing on a cross-selling pro­gram. Giv­ing rep­re­sen­ta­tives a script to read at the end of a call won’t work. I’m sure you’ve been on the other end of those types of calls! What’s needed is a train­ing pro­gram to help agents under­stand how selling—appropriately—is offer­ing ser­vice. It truly is! When a cus­tomer ser­vice or sup­port rep thinks ahead about what prod­ucts and ser­vices might serve cus­tomers, then presents the offer in a way that shows it meets a need the cus­tomer has, cross-selling is offer­ing the cus­tomer “total” ser­vice.

    Amadeus-Forrester, in their recent report titled “Cross-Sell Your Way to Prof­its” pre­dicts cross-selling to grow 30 per­cent by 2015, ten times faster than gen­eral sales. Are you ready to be part of this trend?

    Post #6 in the Top Ten Cus­tomer Ser­vice and Sup­port Trends for 2012 series. 

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    2 Comments "

    Tailoring Customer Service and Support to Different Personalities

    January 15th, 2012

    Fess up, now! There some cus­tomers you just love to talk to and oth­ers that you can’t wait to get off the line, right? Of course there are some cus­tomers who are just down­right cranky and rude, but bar­ring those grouches, there’s a rea­son why you relate bet­ter to some peo­ple than to oth­ers. To sum it up, it’s easy for us to do busi­ness with peo­ple who are like us. For exam­ple, if I want to get to get a quick answer and a cus­tomer ser­vice rep has one for me, I’m happy. How­ever, if I get a CSR who want to chit-chat about unre­lated top­ics, I quickly become quite annoyed.

    Carl Jung, one of the fathers of mod­ern psy­chol­ogy, devel­oped a the­ory of psy­cho­log­i­cal types. The idea is that if we can iden­tify oth­ers’ pref­er­ences and then mod­ify our behav­ior, we’ll all get along bet­ter, pre­vent mis­un­der­stand­ings, and accom­plish more. In the exam­ple above, if the sales or sup­port agent can iden­tify my per­son­al­ity type, then the agent can tem­per his or her need to build a rela­tion­ship and get down to busi­ness. I’ll then leave the call as a sat­is­fied customer.

    Of course, this is overly sim­pli­fied, but the the­ory works so well that a num­ber of com­pa­nies have cre­ated pro­pri­etary instru­ments and train­ing pro­grams around it. NASA even got into the game, using The Process Com­mu­ni­ca­tion Model, to help pre­dict how astro­nauts would jell in a cap­sule together.

    Sales­peo­ple have long known about the power of adjust­ing their per­son­al­ity to that of their var­i­ous cus­tomers. These con­cepts are now mov­ing into the cus­tomer ser­vice and sup­port realm and rapidly becom­ing a trend.

    For exam­ple, on the high-tech front, ELoy­alty uses speech recog­ni­tion tech­nol­ogy to com­pile per­son­al­ity pro­files of callers and match them with a rep­re­sen­ta­tive who works best with that per­son­al­ity type. Each time a cus­tomer calls back, the sys­tem uses the exist­ing pro­file to deepen and enrich the pro­file. Accord­ing to eLoy­alty, one bank­ing client saw the attri­tion rate among cus­tomers strug­gling with the most seri­ous issues drop from 7% to 1%. Another saw their J.D. Power rat­ing improve.

    Other sys­tems you may be famil­iar with are Meyers-Briggs, DiSC, or Insights. One we par­tic­u­larly like is Work­Traits. It assesses not only per­son­al­ity traits, but core con­vic­tions and has some great back-end tools for use on the job. When paired with train­ing, role plays, and job aids to help agents iden­tify caller types and know what to do when sell­ing or pro­vid­ing ser­vice, great results can be achieved.

    Are your agents treat­ing your cus­tomers the way they want to be treated? Look into one of these sys­tems today. And don’t be sur­prised if you see Work­Traits wrapped into a course here at Impact soon.

    Post #4 in the Top Ten Cus­tomer Ser­vice and Sup­port Trends for 2012 series. 

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    No Comments "

    Proactive Customer Service and Support

    January 9th, 2012

    You’ve heard of First Con­tact Res­o­lu­tion, right? Hope­fully, you’re tak­ing con­crete steps to resolve as many issues on the first con­tact as pos­si­ble. Fol­low­ing right on the tail of first con­tact res­o­lu­tion is proac­tive ser­vice. Also called proac­tive sup­port or next issue avoid­ance, it’s a trend worth focus­ing on.

    What is proac­tive service?

    When cus­tomer ser­vice and sup­port reps offer proac­tive ser­vice, they antic­i­pate and pre­empt addi­tional con­tact. Here’s an example:

    Mrs. Pedowitz calls her insur­ance com­pany to get a copy of the con­tract that explains her health insur­ance ben­e­fits. Know­ing that mem­bers often call back for help under­stand­ing the com­plex con­tract, the CSR, Jesse, offers to answer ques­tions about ser­vices Mrs. Pedowitz fre­quently uses. At the end of the call, Jesse offers to e-mail her a link to a sum­mary book­let that is writ­ten in easy-to-understand language.

    Should you fol­low the proac­tive ser­vice trend?

    Accord­ing to Enkata, a leader in cloud-based cus­tomer expe­ri­ence ana­lyt­ics, proac­tive cus­tomer ser­vice has been shown to reduce call vol­umes by 20–30% in 12 months, cut oper­at­ing costs by up to 25%, and improve cus­tomer reten­tion by 3–5%.

    Sound good? Of course! So what’s involved?

     How to get started with proac­tive service:

    1. Cre­ate a map of issues show­ing their relationship—for exam­ple, order­ing a con­tract and answer­ing ques­tions on the phone or send­ing a follow-up link.
    2. Deter­mine how often cus­tomers call back. If they only call back 1–2% of the time, it’s prob­a­bly not worth address­ing. If cus­tomers call back 20–25% of the time, there will be cost-savings that are def­i­nitely worth pursuing.
    3. Train your staff. Pro­vide issues maps as job aids to help your staff deter­mine what to do when a cus­tomer has a par­tic­u­lar issue. Be sure to include role plays so employ­ees get lots of prac­tice intro­duc­ing the proac­tive ser­vice mea­sure into the call.

    Is it really that easy?

    It would be except for the fact that con­tact cen­ters are often focused on short-term prof­itabil­ity met­rics like aver­age han­dle time (AHT). And first con­tact res­o­lu­tion or next issue avoid­ance are dia­met­ri­cally opposed to lower AHT. While cus­tomers want calls to be short, imag­ine how much time they would save (and you too) if they didn’t have to call back for some­thing that could have been proac­tively han­dled on the first call.

    Just think! If you could pre­vent 20% of the calls cur­rently com­ing into your cen­ter, your reps would have more time to spend with cus­tomers in order to guar­an­tee their sat­is­fac­tion with the level of ser­vice and sup­port pro­vided by your com­pany. Sound like a win­ning strat­egy? We think so.

    Post #3 in the Top Ten Cus­tomer Ser­vice and Sup­port Trends for 2012 series. 

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    No Comments "

    Crowdsourcing Customer Service and Support

    January 8th, 2012

    If you’re not already crowd­sourc­ing your cus­tomer ser­vice and sup­port, it’s time to con­sider doing so. Why? Smart busi­nesses are always look­ing for ways to help their cus­tomers. And when you can help your cus­tomers and min­i­mize expenses, why not?

     What is Crowd­sourc­ing?

    Crowd­sourc­ing is using your “crowd” of users as the “source” to help other users. It allows the num­ber of cus­tomer issues you can han­dle to grow with­out your need­ing to incur addi­tional labor costs. By let­ting users par­tic­i­pate in the cus­tomer ser­vice and sup­port process, it puts them cen­ter stage, engages them with your com­pany, and increases loy­alty. And by mon­i­tor­ing the crowd, you get new ideas.

     Who’s Crowd­sourc­ing Cus­tomer Ser­vice and Sup­port Today?

    Pretty much any com­pany with a user forum. Here are just a few:

    • Have a Black­berry? Maybe you use Crack­berry. Kevin Michaluk launched this user sup­ported site and accord­ing to MyCompete, Blackberry.com traf­fic increased 49% in 2010 while Crackberry.com increased 107.4%.
    • Intacct uses crowd­sourc­ing to encour­age cus­tomers and part­ners to cre­ate, refine, and vote on ideas for improve­ments to the Intacct sys­tem through their Cus­tomer and Part­ner Por­tal. Their fall release included 31 new fea­tures that were crowd­sourced from the 8,000 users who participated.
    • Have you bought any­thing from Best Buy? Then you prob­a­bly know about the Twelp­force, a user sup­ported com­mu­nity for all things tech pur­chased at Best Buy. There were over 80 post­ings the day I checked.

    But What If We're Not a Big Company?

    You may notice the com­pa­nies ref­er­enced above are larger com­pa­nies. How­ever the cost of soft­ware has come down mak­ing crowd­sourc­ing cus­tomer ser­vice and sup­port more afford­able for the SMB mar­ket. Check Get­Sat­is­fac­tion, Nap­kin­Labs, or User­Voice for afford­able soft­ware to help you get started.

    How to Use Crowd­sourc­ing for Cus­tomer Ser­vice and Support

    In addi­tion to pro­vid­ing a forum for cus­tomer ser­vice and sup­port, you can con­sider some of these ideas from NapkinLabs:

    • Brain­storm new oppor­tu­ni­ties col­lab­o­ra­tively with cus­tomers, employ­ees, ven­dors, and partners
    • Get focused feed­back on your prod­ucts, ser­vices, pro­mo­tions, etc.
    • Run photo con­tests with user-generated pic­tures and videos to use in your mar­ket­ing materials
    • Post chal­lenges to get new designs for pack­ag­ing or fea­ture updates
    • Col­lect “voice-of-the cus­tomer” tes­ti­mo­ni­als to help your sales team close business

    Check out the Suc­cess Sto­ries from Get­Sat­is­fac­tion cus­tomers for more ideas. For exam­ple, Intuit’s Mint, a lead­ing online per­sonal finan­cial site, used Get­Sat­is­fac­tion for crowd­sourc­ing and within 90 days, saw a 75% reduc­tion in sup­port tickets.

     What to Expect When Crowdsourcing

    When you start? Not much. You’ll need to pro­mote your com­mu­nity to your users just like you’d pro­mote your prod­uct or ser­vice to your prospects. And you’ll need to assign some­one to mod­er­ate the com­mu­nity and answer ques­tions until you get enough users actively par­tic­i­pat­ing. It will take 1,000 or more users to get a com­mu­nity active because accord­ing to the 90−9−1 prin­ci­ple, 90% of mem­bers will be lurk­ers log­ging in now and then to ask a ques­tion, 9% will con­tribute on occa­sion, and 1% will be power users.

    Accord­ing to John Bernier, a Man­ager within the Emerg­ing Plat­forms group at Best Buy and for­mer lead of Best Buy’s Twelp­force ini­tia­tive, when they started Twelp­force in 2009, they weren’t sure what to expect. How­ever, they found that with some good foun­da­tional guide­posts and train­ing tools, the crowd began to orga­nize and gov­ern itself. Lead­ers popped up as coaches or men­tors, and pretty soon they had a really good sup­port net­work in place.

    Crowd­sourc­ing can reduce the bur­den on your staff, save money, and engage your cus­tomers. Will you be part of this grow­ing trend?

    Post #2 in the Top Ten Cus­tomer Ser­vice and Sup­port Trends for 2012 series.

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    No Comments "

    Monitor Your Customers, Not Just Your Agents

    January 7th, 2012

    Com­pa­nies are refram­ing cus­tomer ser­vice as a strate­gic method for gath­er­ing impor­tant infor­ma­tion to inform mar­ket­ing direc­tion and prod­uct devel­op­ment. While you can obtain valu­able insights by mon­i­tor­ing your social media chan­nels, adding insights from your call cen­ter will pro­vide a greater breadth and depth of information.

    Accord­ing to Bruce Temkin of the Temkin Group, “The con­tact cen­ter has always housed a large per­cent­age of impor­tant inter­ac­tions with cus­tomers, but com­pa­nies learn very lit­tle from these key touch­points. That’s chang­ing. Newer tech­nolo­gies allow com­pa­nies to extract deep insights from unstruc­tured con­tent like recorded calls, emails, and chat ses­sions. Lead­ing com­pa­nies will learn what dri­ves sat­is­fac­tion and loy­alty, and use the infor­ma­tion to change the prod­ucts they sell, how they mar­ket their offer­ings, and how they ser­vice customers.”

    How to Employ This Cus­tomer Ser­vice Strategy

    Whether you mon­i­tor live or recorded calls, whether you use state-of-the-art speech recog­ni­tion tech­nol­ogy like Envision’s Speech­Miner or VIP’s Speech Ana­lyt­ics soft­ware, or whether you train a spe­cial team of cus­tomer ser­vice strat­egy ana­lysts to lis­ten to your cus­tomers just like you train qual­ity ana­lysts to lis­ten to your agents, under­stand­ing the customer’s point of view is invalu­able in know­ing in which direc­tion the com­pany needs to move.

    Some things to lis­ten for include:

    • What your cus­tomers say about your prod­ucts and your company
    • Why they’re buy­ing your products—and why they’re not buy­ing them
    • The tech­ni­cal dif­fi­cul­ties your cus­tomers face when try­ing to find infor­ma­tion or place an order on your website
    • Which calls could be han­dled more quickly and less expen­sively by a self-service option
    • How your cus­tomers are react­ing to your promotions
    • What your cus­tomers say about their online shop­ping experience
    • Rea­sons for low sales con­ver­sions that are beyond your sales team’s control
    • What cus­tomers most fre­quently com­plain about

    Whether you go high tech or low tech, start lis­ten­ing today. Your cus­tomers will thank you for it!

    Post #1 in the Top Ten Cus­tomer Ser­vice and Sup­port Trends for 2012 series.

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    No Comments "

    FCR and Customer Satisfaction: A Match Made in Heaven

    December 9th, 2011

    When you call a sup­port cen­ter to get help on an issue or have a ques­tion answered, will you be more sat­is­fied with the com­pany if:

    1. The cus­tomer rep­re­sen­ta­tive is knowl­edge­able and is able to resolve your issue on the first call?
    2. The rep­re­sen­ta­tive is unsure how to help you, puts you on hold, and then asks you to call back so that a super­vi­sor can help you?

    It’s pretty obvi­ous, right? If a com­pany can resolve your prob­lem on the first try, you’ll think more favor­ably of the com­pany and rate your cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion expe­ri­ence higher.

    First-Call Res­o­lu­tion (FCR) is one of the simplest—and most effec­tive ways a com­pany can improve cus­tomer satisfaction.

    The sta­tis­tics back the cor­re­la­tion between FCR and cus­tomer satisfaction

    Numer­ous stud­ies between FCR and CSAT rates show the link. For example:

    • 20% of callers don’t have their issue resolved on the first call.
    • 68% of those with unre­solved issues are at risk for defect­ing to another company.
    • CSAT rates are, on aver­age, 35–45 % lower when a sec­ond call is made for the same issue.
    • For every 1% of FCR improve­ment, com­pa­nies are likely to see a 1% improve­ment in CSAT rates.
    • When an issue is resolved on the first try, only 3% of cus­tomers are likely to go to a competitor.

    And the stats go on … but you get the point. To improve your cus­tomer ser­vice, work on your FCR rates. There's def­i­nitely a busi­ness case for address­ing res­o­lu­tion rates!

    But, for many com­pa­nies, improv­ing FCR is a com­plex issue. What’s going on?

    Just improve your FCR and you’ll have hap­pier cus­tomers! Eas­ier said than done, right? Let’s exam­ine some of the most com­mon bar­ri­ers to FCR.

    • Com­plex Prod­ucts or Issues: FCR is much eas­ier for, say, an online retail store, where a cus­tomer is call­ing to get more infor­ma­tion on dress sizes, than a web-hosting com­pany that deals with tech­ni­cal domain issues and server problems.If you have a com­plex prob­lem or have a sup­port cen­ter that deals with highly tech­ni­cal mat­ters, focus­ing on FCR may not apply. If that’s the case, focus on hav­ing highly trained, independent-thinking reps who can work effi­ciently to solve cus­tomer matters—even if it takes mul­ti­ple calls. Your focus then will be on reduc­ing the time or the num­ber of calls until the issue is resolved.
    • To mea­sure FCR, you have to first define “fix.” When track­ing met­rics of any kind, you need to clearly define your track­ing para­me­ters. For FCR, what does “fix” a cus­tomers’ issue mean to you? Did you solve a URL issue, but still leave open other ques­tions that need to be tack­led? Define issues, prob­lem by prob­lem (or in a set of prob­lems, as the case may be) before you set out to track and improve FCR rates. Addi­tion­ally, you’ll need to define what “con­tact” means. Is e-mail a con­tact? Is a web-generated request a contact?
    • It takes two to tango. When look­ing at FCR, you may find it hard to con­trol your rates if you have a cus­tomer base with a low level of expe­ri­ence. Depend­ing on your indus­try and prod­uct, your customer’s under­stand­ing of the prod­uct will affect how long it takes for the rep­re­sen­ta­tive to resolve the issue. If you sell B2B tech­ni­cal equip­ment,  your cus­tomer will likely have a base under­stand­ing of the prod­uct and may just need a lit­tle assis­tance. But if you are sell­ing tech­ni­cal ser­vices to the B2C world, the learn­ing curve may be steeper and the time to res­o­lu­tion longer.
    • Tech­ni­cal skills of your rep­re­sen­ta­tives. The train­ing you pro­vide to your rep­re­sen­ta­tives can make a dra­matic dif­fer­ence in your FCR rates—particularly if you have a tech­ni­cal ser­vice or prod­uct. Hope­fully your man­age­ment team under­stands that an invest­ment in tech­ni­cal cus­tomer ser­vice train­ing is well-worth it when con­sid­er­ing the ram­i­fi­ca­tions of low FCR rates.
    • Self-service’s impact on FCR. More and more cus­tomers rely on web forums—and on your website—to help them resolve issues. This means that cus­tomers who would have called you pre­vi­ously (most likely with eas­ier issues) are now fig­ur­ing out answers them­selves. Cus­tomers who do end up call­ing, there­fore, are often those who couldn’t resolve the issue and present more com­plex prob­lems that could be harder to resolve on the first call.
    • Your rep­re­sen­ta­tives’ com­fort level with inter­nal tools. You may think that a hefty invest­ment in a slick CRM sys­tem is just the ticket, but with any inter­nal tools you have in place, make sure you train your reps thor­oughly on how to use the tools at their dis­posal. If a rep­re­sen­ta­tive is fum­bling or tak­ing a long time to fig­ure out how to use a sys­tem, most likely, it will take longer (or not be pos­si­ble) to solve a cus­tomer issue on the first try.

    The les­son? Improve the fac­tors you can con­trol that help improve FCR

    The above list is just a brief sam­ple of the many bar­ri­ers that com­pa­nies face when con­fronting low FCR rates and unde­sir­able CSAT scores. How­ever, even if you have a very com­plex prod­uct, and even if you’re deal­ing with a cus­tomer base that comes to you with a lower-level of under­stand­ing, you can still offer stel­lar cus­tomer ser­vice and get your FCR rates as low as pos­si­ble for your indus­try and prod­uct type. The key? Your cus­tomer ser­vice train­ing pro­gram. When you choose to focus on the qual­ity of ser­vice your rep­re­sen­ta­tives offer your cus­tomers, and the tech­ni­cal train­ing your employ­ees receive, you are likely to see a nat­ural increase in your FCR rates, and your loyal cus­tomers will con­tinue to reward you with busi­ness. Heavenly!

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    No Comments "

    Thermo Fisher Scientific Improves Customer Allegiance

    December 5th, 2011

    The Anatom­i­cal Pathol­ogy Busi­ness Unit of Thermo Fisher Sci­en­tific under­stands the impor­tance of cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion on prof­itabil­ity. To ensure sat­is­fac­tion is at its high­est, they mea­sure cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion for field ser­vice accord­ing to a Cus­tomer Alle­giance Score (CAS). In addi­tion to mea­sur­ing over­all sat­is­fac­tion and will­ing­ness to rec­om­mend the com­pany to oth­ers, CAS mea­sures the ease of sched­ul­ing on-site vis­its, on-time arrival, cour­tesy, Field Ser­vice Engi­neer (FSE) knowl­edge level, timely ser­vice com­ple­tion, thor­ough­ness of doc­u­men­ta­tion and level of pre­pared­ness to solve the problem.

    When Betsy Trescher joined the Anatom­i­cal pathol­ogy (AP) Busi­ness Unit at Thermo Fisher Scientific's Kala­ma­zoo, Michi­gan loca­tion as the Instru­men­ta­tion Tech­ni­cal Trainer, 90% of train­ing efforts were focused on tech­ni­cal skills. She quickly saw that in order to improve the CAS score, atten­tion would need to be paid to FSEs' plan­ning, com­mu­ni­ca­tion, and doc­u­men­ta­tion skills—not just tech­ni­cal skills—and she began search­ing for a solution.

    While trav­el­ing with the AP Unit's FSE, Erik Led­ford, she noted his excel­lent approach to cus­tomer ser­vice. Betsy and Erik started to develop a pro­gram in-house, but after some ini­tial design meet­ings, real­ized they wouldn't have time to develop a qual­ity pro­gram. They searched for an off-the-shelf pro­gram that aligned with Erik's phi­los­o­phy and approach. They chose to work with Impact Learn­ing Sys­tems because our pro­gram, Get­ting to the Heart of Field Ser­vice™  addressed all the issues in their CAS sur­vey and could be cus­tomized to include real-life AP Busi­ness Unit scenarios.

    One chal­lenge in imple­ment­ing the train­ing was that the FSEs were spread out geo­graph­i­cally. To over­come this chal­lenge, Betsy asked FSEs to com­plete one online mod­ule every 2–3 weeks. Once they'd com­pleted all mod­ules, she used Impact's Trainer's Man­ual to con­duct a 1-day class in 6 key loca­tions through­out the coun­try, train­ing on Sat­ur­day so that cus­tomers weren't impacted. One year later, Betsy is embark­ing on refresher train­ing to be sure that results are sustained.

    And what were the results?

    • The AP Busi­ness Unit's Cus­tomer Alle­giance Scores for Field Ser­vice at Kala­ma­zoo, Michi­gan increased 151% from 18.4 to 47.3 in the year fol­low­ing training.
    • The depart­ment Betsy trained ranked as the 7th most improved depart­ment world­wide for CAS scores. Only 3 other field ser­vice depart­ments were included in the top 25.

    Accord­ing to Betsy, "A num­ber of sea­soned tech­ni­cians said they learned some­thing new. The most com­mon skill they men­tion is how to deliver bad news in a good way. For exam­ple, we've removed the world 'back-order' from our vocab­u­lary. It's made a huge dif­fer­ence in cus­tomer perception!"

    If you'd like to improve your cus­tomer alle­giance — whether through the field ser­vice, tech­ni­cal sup­port, or cus­tomer ser­vice you offer your cus­tomers — give us a call. We're the lead­ers in the field and have a track record of pro­vid­ing mea­sur­able results for our clients.

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    No Comments "

    Sales Skills: Training (Nurture) or Personality (Nature)?

    November 8th, 2011

    The age-old debate—nature ver­sus nur­ture is a com­mon theme that pops up for man­agers who are seek­ing the right sales can­di­dates. It’s an impor­tant ques­tion: Do peo­ple have an innate per­son­al­ity abil­ity to sell (nature) or is it a skill that can be taught (nurture)?

    If proper coach­ing is one of the biggest fac­tors in sales, then a com­pany should rightly focus their efforts on sales train­ing and exam­ine how man­age­ment lead the sales team.

    But if great sales ulti­mately comes down to per­son­al­ity, then per­haps HR and man­age­ment should start screen­ing specif­i­cally on innate traits—and maybe even incor­po­rate per­son­al­ity tests into the hir­ing process.

    To exam­ine the debate in more detail, we decided to con­duct our own sort of “vir­tual focus group,” if you will, by comb­ing through the great World Wide Web and doing a com­par­a­tive analy­sis  on the topic by look­ing at sales web­sites, blogs, arti­cles, and forums. Below we present a sum­mary of the most com­mon themes that we found in our research.

    When that glass is half-full …

    A person’s sense of opti­mism was a com­mon theme that we found through­out our sur­vey on the topic. In the sales world, your staff will face rejection—repeatedly.  The abil­ity to see the pos­i­tive in sit­u­a­tions and carry on, even in the face of adver­sity and frus­tra­tion, is an impor­tant trait for sales­peo­ple. One arti­cle even cited a study that found a pos­i­tive cor­re­la­tion between sales and a person’s level of optimism.

    This brings us to our next question—is opti­mism nature or nur­ture? Again, a sur­vey on the topic found it to be split—many peo­ple believe that whether some­one tends toward opti­mism or pes­simism depends on per­son­al­ity traits and on how a per­son was raised and has learned to respond to situations.

    For the pur­poses of this dis­cus­sion, how­ever, let’s focus on how your team’s dis­po­si­tion is as-it-stands. You can test for opti­mism through an inter­view process or writ­ten test. If you spend enough time screen­ing a can­di­date, his or her out­look on whether that glass is half-full or half-empty will become apparent.

    Empa­thy  and sales skills

    A person’s level of empa­thy is a close runner-up to opti­mism. When a per­son is empa­thetic, he or she will see sales as ful­fill­ing a need, ver­sus sim­ply push­ing a prod­uct. Empa­thetic peo­ple will more closely lis­ten to a prospect’s desires, ask the right ques­tions, and fig­ure out how to frame the item or ser­vice cor­rectly that so it addresses what a buyer is after.

    Empa­thy, sim­i­lar to opti­mism, is a trait that seems to be a result of nature and nur­ture. You can teach peo­ple to be more empa­thetic, but cer­tain peo­ple tend to have an innate abil­ity to lis­ten and oper­ate more intuitively.

    Moti­va­tion

    Moti­va­tion is a sales skill that you can fos­ter through incen­tives and coach­ing, but at the end of the day, a per­son needs to want it—sales peo­ple have to pos­sess a cer­tain amount of drive. Moti­va­tion is a per­son­al­ity trait that a good coach can cap­ture and build.

    It’s one thing to hire can­di­dates who are moti­vated, but your team will be more effec­tive if you can coach them with the right incen­tives to keep their moti­va­tion high. There­fore, when look­ing for can­di­dates, find peo­ple who are self-directed and respond to entice­ments, and then work on train­ing and coach­ing to keep the fire hot.

    Self-Confidence

    A person’s self-confidence tends to be a com­bi­na­tion of nature and nur­ture. Some peo­ple will remain wildly con­fi­dent, even if they’ve been in envi­ron­ments that break down other people’s self-belief. Oth­ers need to be con­stantly given reas­sur­ance and guidance.

    When build­ing your sales staff, look for con­fi­dence, but don’t con­fuse con­fi­dence with arro­gance. Con­fi­dence, in sales, is a skill closely tied to per­sis­tence. If your staff mem­bers imme­di­ately give up after the first “no,” chance are, they won’t make it very far in the sales world. Addi­tion­ally, you want team mem­bers who believe in the prod­uct and can be assertive, when necessary.

    So … is it nature or nur­ture in the sales world?

    What can we con­clude from our online sur­vey on the nature ver­sus nur­ture debate? It appears that suc­cess­ful sales peo­ple need to come to the job with cer­tain hard-wired per­son­al­ity traits, such as the abil­ity to see things opti­misti­cally, pick up on social cues and be empa­thetic, and have a cer­tain amount of drive. Which answers the “nature” side of the equation.

    How­ever, the other side—“nurture” is equally impor­tant. A per­son who pos­sesses all of the nec­es­sary per­son­al­ity traits still needs the proper guid­ance and coach­ing to help him reach his peak. More­over, if you take a can­di­date with small doses of opti­mism, empa­thy, and drive, and give them care­ful coach­ing, you’ll uncover the hid­den sales superstar.

    Inter­ested in learn­ing more about sales, train­ing, and moti­va­tion? More posts can be found here.

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    4 Comments "

    7 Steps to Developing a Customer Experience Strategy

    November 4th, 2011

    Accord­ing to Michael Maoz from Gart­ner, exec­u­tives are try­ing to re-engage with cus­tomers through cus­tomer ser­vice, and cus­tomer expe­ri­ence in par­tic­u­lar. Eighty per­cent of exec­u­tives believe that cus­tomer strat­egy is more impor­tant than it was three years ago. Ninety to ninety-five per­cent of exec­u­tives expect cus­tomer expe­ri­ence will be part of their spe­cific com­pet­i­tive dif­fer­en­ti­a­tion in the next two to three years.

    The arti­cle, "Devel­op­ing a Cus­tomer Expe­ri­ence Strat­egy in a Cloudy World," fea­tured in  TSIA's "Inside Tech­nol­ogy Ser­vices" pro­vides 7 steps to guide you in devel­op­ing your own cus­tomer expe­ri­ence strat­egy. Good stuff!

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    No Comments "

    Churn to Retention: How You Can Make the Switch

    August 16th, 2011

    We live in a world of cut­throat com­pe­ti­tion. If you want to grow your busi­ness and stay ahead of your rivals, your mantra bet­ter be Sell. Sell. Sell., right? Focus on your sales team, and throw your weight around the new– busi­ness acqui­si­tion model.

    Yet…It’s com­mon knowl­edge around con­fer­ence tables that retain­ing a client is much more cost effec­tive than the price of obtain­ing new clients. Com­pa­nies study their cus­tomer churn rates with the same inten­sity they put toward their quar­terly finan­cial statements.

    Indus­try aver­age churn rates vary, but esti­mates in the telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions sec­tor state that annual churn rates range between 10 and 67 per­cent. Other indus­tries claim to have a churn rate of 50% every five years. For many com­pa­nies, the cost of acquir­ing, rather than retain­ing, cus­tomers is 10 times higher.

    Low Sat­is­fac­tion, Yet High Retention?

    You may have seen some of AT& T’s stats prior to them los­ing exclu­siv­ity of the iPhone: their cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion (CSAT) rates were at 23%, yet their churn rate was 8%. (You can bet they sent a Christ­mas card to Steve Jobs.) Pretty remark­able, espe­cially when you look at their competition’s rates. Verizon’s CSAT rate was around 49%, with a churn rate of 7%.

    How did they do it? Why did 77% of dis­sat­is­fied clients keep renew­ing their AT&T wire­less plans? Ana­lysts attrib­uted reten­tion to two fac­tors: AT&T’s iPhone exclu­siv­ity and the wire­less carrier’s fam­ily and cor­po­rate plans. (To put the rates in con­text, in the non-AT&T world, one sur­vey found that 70% of cus­tomers leave because of poor service.)

    You can bet that the indus­try will be closely mon­i­tor­ing how AT&T revises their reten­tion strat­egy, now that the iPhone isn’t exclu­sively in their back pocket, so to speak.

    Churn Rate: Does Your Com­pany Need to Shift its Attention?

    Com­pa­nies com­plain about their high churn rates and bemoan how expen­sive it is to acquire new clients. CEOs walk around car­ry­ing cof­fee cups embla­zoned with “If we don’t take care of our cus­tomers, some­one else will.” Yet, when you study how the major­ity of com­pa­nies allo­cate their dol­lars, clear pat­terns emerge: sales teams are given a far greater share than cus­tomer ser­vice rep­re­sen­ta­tives. Com­pen­sa­tion plans and orga­ni­za­tional struc­tures are weighted toward new clients, rather than exist­ing ones.

    Reten­tion: New Focus for Your Company

    The sim­ple answer is to focus on cus­tomer reten­tion. How? Well, if 70% of cus­tomers who leave claim it was because of poor ser­vice, you can cer­tainly start by fig­ur­ing out how to deliver value to the peo­ple pur­chas­ing your prod­ucts. Nar­row in on your reten­tion strat­egy by under­stand­ing what you’re doing right and rem­e­dy­ing what you’re doing wrong. Some research may be in order.

    First, find out what you’re doing right. Yes, go for the good news first. Iden­tify what “loyal” clients look like and reach out to them for some research (offer an attrac­tive incen­tive or discounts—customers will bite). Deter­mine what they enjoy about your prod­uct or ser­vice, and take notes on what influ­ences them to be loyal to your busi­ness. You’ll see pat­terns emerge.

    Then, fig­ure out what you need to fix. Fig­ur­ing out how to improve the cus­tomer expe­ri­ence will take a holis­tic approach. Here are some ideas:

    • Con­duct cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion sur­veys to iden­tify weak­nesses and strengths (this is dif­fer­ent from look­ing at your loyal clients—here, you’ll be ask­ing more com­pre­hen­sive ques­tions, on a scale, about your services)
    • Do fre­quent price com­par­isons in your indus­try to gauge whether your prod­uct is priced too high or low
    • Con­duct a cohort analy­sis among cus­tomers who started using your ser­vice at the same time and track them for a period of 6 months to a year. By look­ing at a group that started using your ser­vice in the same month, you’ll start to see pat­terns emerge if you change your prod­uct, pric­ing, or if your com­pe­ti­tion makes a big move
    • Iden­tify the rea­sons why your cus­tomers leave. If they switch ser­vice providers, ask for their input so you can track the decision-making process and adjust accordingly

    Finally, Allo­cate More of Your Bud­get Toward Your Priorities

    If reduc­ing your churn rate is truly a com­pany pri­or­ity, shift a pro­por­tion­ate amount of your bud­get toward reten­tion, instead of acqui­si­tion. Invest in your cus­tomer ser­vice train­ing for your customer-facing agents, and make low-churn a com­pany cornerstone.

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    No Comments "

    Differentiate Yourself With Customer Service

    July 26th, 2011

    Com­pa­nies that are vying for the bur­geon­ing cloud com­put­ing and host­ing busi­ness have some fierce com­pe­ti­tion against indus­try heavy­weights. Ama­zon, Google, Microsoft. Yep. That's some stiff com­pe­ti­tion. You may not com­pete with the likes of these behe­moths, but you've still got your own mar­ket lead­ers to go after, right? So what can you do with­out spend­ing all your heard-earned capital?

    If you’re the Texas-based com­pany, Rack­space, you focus on cus­tomer service.

    Tak­ing on the Ama­zons of the world

    Bloomberg Busi­ness­week pro­filed Rack­space and dis­cussed the 12-year old company’s strat­egy for not only stay­ing afloat, but charg­ing ahead in the highly com­pet­i­tive indus­try of host­ing and cloud com­put­ing. The com­pany has wres­tled with the ups and downs that strike many tech­nol­ogy com­pa­nies, includ­ing hir­ing and retain­ing top pro­gram­ming tal­ent, stretch­ing cash in a capital-intensive busi­ness, and stay­ing ahead of the tech­nol­ogy curve.

    Rackspace’s Chair­man, Gra­ham Weston, has man­aged to pull his com­pany back from the brink of dis­as­ter and drive the busi­ness toward 30 per­cent annual sales growth by mak­ing cus­tomer ser­vice the mantra of his busi­ness. In fact, the company’s main brand plat­form is “fanat­i­cal support.”

    Whoa. Really?

    Not “the most advanced host­ing ser­vice” or “the fastest tech­nol­ogy,” but sup­port that goes so far and above typ­i­cal cus­tomer ser­vice it’s best described as fanat­i­cal?

    Yes. And it’s working.

    Putting fanat­i­cal cus­tomer ser­vice into action

    As an exam­ple of Rackspace’s com­mit­ment to cus­tomer ser­vice, com­pare what hap­pened when Ama­zon had their cloud-hosting ser­vice crash ver­sus what hap­pened when Rack­space lost cloud power. From the article…

    Ama­zon sent its cus­tomers a two-week credit and an apol­ogy let­ter. A sin­cere ges­ture, for sure, and appro­pri­ate for a com­pany of Amazon’s size.

    When Rack­space lost power, its employ­ees per­son­ally called thou­sands of cus­tomers to apol­o­gize, explained what was occur­ring, and issued refunds. The com­pany was insis­tent on per­sonal com­mu­ni­ca­tion while they worked out sys­tem kinks, and their cus­tomers were pleased by the effort.

    Rack­space has also been known to do things such as send cus­tomers pizza when they know the cus­tomers are stuck at the office late, or call them and sing “Happy Birth­day” over the speak­er­phone. The cus­tomer ser­vice cul­ture, in short, is deeply inter­twined in Rackspace’s busi­ness model.

    Apply­ing Rackspace’s cus­tomer ser­vice lessons to your company

    So what can we learn from Rackspace’s approach? The com­pany proudly adver­tises their cus­tomer ser­vice phi­los­o­phy, and they’ve cre­ated a web­page ded­i­cated to pro­claim­ing their tenets. Here’s what they do:

    Trans­parency and lis­ten­ing skills: The company’s employ­ees are trained to be trans­par­ent and lis­ten to the cus­tomers. Rack­space under­stands that cus­tomers want a com­pany that can hear and understand.

    Resource­ful: Rack­space empow­ers their cus­tomer ser­vice rep­re­sen­ta­tives to solve prob­lems and be resourceful—their cus­tomer ser­vice train­ing goes one step fur­ther than sim­ply solv­ing issues from a manual.

    Skills: They take their cus­tomer ser­vice train­ing for tech­ni­cal sup­port seri­ously. Rack­space invests, really  invests, in their employ­ees to make sure their staff are knowl­edge­able and experts at guid­ing cus­tomers through prob­lem solv­ing and tech­ni­cal sup­port issues.

    Account­abil­ity: Rack­space under­stands that cus­tomers want to work with a com­pany that takes respon­si­bil­ity for prob­lems and is accountable.

    Time­li­ness: They pride them­selves on prompt, atten­tive service.

    How does your com­pany mea­sure up?

    Regard­less of the field you’re in, choos­ing to make cus­tomer ser­vice the hall­mark of your brand will set you apart, even if your tech­nol­ogy isn’t the best, or you’re not first to mar­ket, or you don’t have the most inex­pen­sive prod­uct. Assess­ing your cur­rent cus­tomer ser­vice deliv­ery, mak­ing needed changes in peo­ple, processes and tech­nol­ogy, and invest­ing in cus­tomer ser­vice train­ing, will help you shine through a crowded, com­pet­i­tive marketplace.

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    2 Comments "

    Successful Upselling and Cross-Selling: Your Must-Have Checklist

    July 5th, 2011

    Last year, we wrote a blog that offered 3 tips for cross-selling and upselling suc­cess. The theme of the post was uncov­er­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties and we stressed that suc­cess­ful sell­ing is closely tied to read­ing the cus­tomer. Once your reps have learned the art of uncov­er­ing oppor­tu­ni­ties, they’ll be able to cre­ate moments where it’s appro­pri­ate to offer addi­tional services.

    Unless you sell just one prod­uct or item (which, if you have cus­tomer ser­vice rep­re­sen­ta­tives or a con­tact cen­ter, we’re guess­ing you don’t), there are a myr­iad of ways to put your addi­tional prod­ucts and ser­vices in front of the cus­tomer. Below we offer a handy checklist.

    “Super-Size”your cus­tomer. McDonald’s, well, let’s just say they get the art of the upsell. “Would you like extra large fries for only 20¢ more?” will not be a sen­tence your reps will utter, but you can cer­tainly use the same tac­tics. For exam­ple, “For only $5.00 more, you can get 2,500 post­cards.” Break it down for them—they’ll see the value.

    Point out addi­tional fea­tures. Assume that your cus­tomers don’t research all of the add-on fea­tures or ser­vices you offer. Take the car sales­man. You may not know you want those back­seat cup hold­ers, but he does.

    Upsell on qual­ity. For exam­ple, “Have you seen our PD3X printer? It prints four times faster, and only costs an addi­tional $150.00.” Train your reps to look for every oppor­tu­nity to offer the next step-up in your products—especially when they sense it would be use­ful for your cus­tomers’ needs. (This is where it’s a good idea to be famil­iar with a cus­tomers’ pur­chas­ing history.)

    Extend your breadth of prod­ucts or ser­vices. Say you have an online run­ning shoe store, sell­ing a spe­cific style of shoe—that’s your niche, and it works. Well, you should prob­a­bly also sell socks, right?

    Acces­sorize. Sup­plies and acces­sories are an easy-in. If you sell TVs, offer cable cords and USB cords that con­nect to the TV. You don’t need to become a full-service one-stop shop, nec­es­sar­ily, but cer­tainly offer the rel­e­vant sup­plies that go with your products.

    Add on a ser­vice. Ever thought about what a war­ranty is? The war­ranty is just a sim­ple way to upsell. Depend­ing on your prod­uct or indus­try, find ways to add value with addi­tional ser­vice or insur­ance. The air­lines do a great job of this. Trip-cancellation insurance—ever bought it? If so, you were upsold on service.

    Throw in that gift! C’mon, who doesn’t like free address labels when they pur­chase an addi­tional 50 envelopes? Gifts work. Peo­ple love free things, even if they’re “pay­ing” for it with the upsell.

    Employ the Costco effect. One thing that Amer­ica does excep­tion­ally well is bulk. There’s some­thing puz­zlingly sat­is­fy­ing about get­ting a ten-pack of under­shirts for $7.00 apiece, ver­sus a three-pack for $10.00 apiece—even if you have no idea what you’ll do with so many spare undershirts.

    Offer a con­tract. If you offer ser­vice or prod­ucts some­what fre­quently, why not get a guar­an­tee on future ser­vices by writ­ing up a retainer or pur­chase con­tract? Say you hire a jan­i­to­r­ial ser­vice occa­sion­ally for your office. If they offered to clean for $10/hour, instead of $12/hour if you sign a six-month con­tract, you just might go for it, right? Congrats—you were just upsold with a pur­chase contract.

    You may have read the above list but still feel that your cus­tomer ser­vice team could use some extra help and motivation—after all, sell­ing is an art, and cus­tomer ser­vice rep­re­sen­ta­tives often don’t want to feel like sales­peo­ple. At Impact Learn­ing Sys­tems, we offer train­ing pro­grams for upselling and cross-selling that will give your team more con­fi­dence and help them mas­ter the craft of upselling and cross-selling.

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    No Comments "

    What's Wrong With Customer Service?

    June 24th, 2011

    Bob Cowen at Snowfly alerted me to the July, 2011 issue of Con­sumer Reports Mag­a­zine. On page 16, there's a list of the best and worst com­pa­nies in 21 dif­fer­ent busi­ness cat­e­gories (hotel chains, on-line retail­ers, phone com­pa­nies, tech sup­port, etc.) com­piled from 3 years of sub­scriber surveys.

    If you work at one of the com­pa­nies in the "best" col­umn, con­grat­u­la­tions! You're doing things right. If you're work­ing at a com­pany listed in the "worst" col­umn, this is a wake-up call that presents an oppor­tu­nity to make some changes. If your com­pany isn't listed, keep read­ing to be sure you qual­ify for the "best" side of the list next year!

    Abide by the GetH­u­man Cus­tomer Ser­vice Standard

    The GetH­u­man Cus­tomer Ser­vice Stan­dard, pro­vides spec­i­fi­ca­tions for mak­ing the phone sys­tems used in cus­tomer ser­vice and sup­port eas­ier, more effec­tive and more effi­cient for cus­tomers. Call your own company's num­ber. Is the IVR help­ful? Can you find your way to a human being? Or do you end up in IVR-loop hell?

    Hire the Right People

    The skills peo­ple dis­play when they're inter­view­ing are not nec­es­sar­ily the skills they need to have in order pro­vide top-notch cus­tomer ser­vice and sup­port. Yes, it costs to use stan­dard­ized assess­ments dur­ing hir­ing, but the costs of hir­ing and train­ing a rep who isn't suited for the job are much, much higher! Check out the assess­ments for con­tact cen­ter reps and super­vi­sors from by Furst­Per­son and ImpactAchieve­ment and com­pare the cost against replac­ing a rep who isn't per­form­ing up to par at your company.

    Make Train­ing an Ongo­ing Event

    Most com­pa­nies pro­vide cus­tomer ser­vice train­ing for new hires. How­ever, the skill level they leave class with degrades sig­nif­i­cantly over time. One major com­puter man­u­fac­turer we worked with, for exam­ple, had aver­age scores of 72% for first call res­o­lu­tion (FCR) and 81% for cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion (CSAT). Thirty days after we trained a pilot group of 30 rep­re­sen­ta­tives, the pilot group had moved their scores to 82.4% for FCR and 94% for CSAT. How­ever, with­out on-the-job rein­force­ment and a con­tin­u­ous improve­ment pro­gram, within 60 days, the scores of the pilot group started falling back to the center's norm.

    Don't For­get the Supervisors!

    One of the things I love about con­tact cen­ters is that they fre­quently pro­mote from within. How­ever, we've observed that unless they've had a strong men­tor or train­ing in proper call cen­ter coach­ing, most agents pro­moted to super­vi­sor tend to super­vise as they were par­ented —and that doesn't work out very well.  Super­vi­sors need to learn how to cre­ate a cli­mate for suc­cess, set team and indi­vid­ual goals, coach to mea­sur­able per­for­mance stan­dards, and han­dle dif­fi­cult employee situations.

    In sum­mary, if you hire the right peo­ple, pro­vide con­tin­u­ous train­ing to keep agent knowl­edge and skill level high, and train super­vi­sors so they have the skills to inspire and moti­vate agents to pro­vide stel­lar ser­vice, you, too, can make it to the top of the list next year.

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    No Comments "

    Internal Customer Service Drives External Customer Satisfaction

    June 17th, 2011

    MAKO Sur­gi­cal mar­kets a fam­ily of knee implants for a min­i­mally inva­sive pro­ce­dure called MAKO­plasty. Some of you may be walk­ing around pain-free thanks to MAKO.

    Like many med­ical device com­pa­nies, Mako Sur­gi­cal has spe­cial­ists who are present in the oper­at­ing room to con­sult with physi­cians. These spe­cial­ists, who pro­vide the face-to-face con­tact with cus­tomers, are backed up by a team of inter­nal employ­ees: Field Ser­vice tech­ni­cians repair equip­ment onsite; tech­ni­cal sup­port tech­ni­cians, clin­i­cal sup­port tech­ni­cians, and cus­tomer ser­vice rep­re­sen­ta­tives pro­vide sup­port by phone.

    Why Focus on Inter­nal Cus­tomer Service?

    While many com­pa­nies seek­ing to improve cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion would think of only train­ing their customer-facing employ­ees, Rachele Riv­ière, Cus­tomer Rela­tions Man­ager, and Tom Klug, Sr. Direc­tor of Cus­tomer Sup­port, real­ized that with­out good com­mu­ni­ca­tion and a com­mon vision of ser­vice between the inter­nal sup­port staff and the MAKO­plasty Spe­cial­ists, it would be dif­fi­cult to achieve high cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion scores.

    Rachele and Tom selected Impact Learn­ing Sys­tems to help their teams improve in spe­cific areas such as lis­ten­ing and act­ing on inputs from cus­tomers, respond­ing quickly and pro­fes­sion­ally, treat­ing cus­tomers as long-term, val­ued cus­tomers, hav­ing effi­cient processes, and pro­vid­ing qual­ity ser­vice so that the cus­tomer would rec­om­mend MAKO to others.

    How MAKO Improved Inter­nal Cus­tomer Service

    The MAKO sup­port staff com­pleted Get­ting to the Heart of Cus­tomer Ser­vice™, Get­ting to the Heart of Tech­ni­cal Sup­port, and Get­ting to the Heart of Field Ser­viceall designed to improve cus­tomer com­mu­ni­ca­tion skills while cre­at­ing a com­mon ser­vice lan­guage and improv­ing oper­a­tions. Man­agers com­pleted the super­vi­sion course, Mak­ing It Hap­pen, and Impact pro­vided a trainer to facil­i­tate a class-room prac­tice session.

    What Were the Results?

    Pro­vid­ing con­sis­tent inter­nal cus­tomer ser­vice has impacted cus­tomer per­cep­tions of MAKO. Six months after train­ing, they’ve achieved the fol­low­ing results:

    • 6% increase in “lis­tens and acts on my input”
    • 2% increase in “is easy to do busi­ness with”
    • 2% increase in “responds quickly and professionally”
    • 7% increase in “process efficiency”
    • 5% increase in “I would rec­om­mend MAKO to a colleague”

    If you have inter­nal teams that need to work more in har­mony to bet­ter serve your cus­tomers, let us know. We’d love to help them develop a uni­fied vision of ser­vice and skills to take your cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion to a new level.

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    1 Comment "

    To Improve Customer Satisfaction, Memorize These 3 Principles of Employee Satisfaction

    June 14th, 2011

    If you’ve ever cov­eted a J.D. Power award for Cus­tomer Ser­vice Cham­pi­ons, or if keep­ing the cus­tomer ser­vice sat­is­fac­tion (CSAT) score high at your com­pany falls under your job descrip­tion, this post is for you. Improv­ing CSAT scores, and ulti­mately, dri­ving busi­ness by cre­at­ing prod­ucts and ser­vices that keep sat­is­fied cus­tomers com­ing back for more is no easy task. Pro­vid­ing ade­quate train­ing for your cus­tomer ser­vice rep­re­sen­ta­tives is nec­es­sary, for sure, but there’s more to the CSAT pic­ture than sim­ply a well-trained employee.

    How about a well-trained, happy employee? Now that’s a step in the right direc­tion. Let’s look at three prin­ci­ples for improv­ing employee sat­is­fac­tion, which will pos­i­tively influ­ence cus­tomer satisfaction.

    Prin­ci­ple #1: Under­stand the link between employee sat­is­fac­tion and cus­tomer satisfaction

    A widely researched topic in the cus­tomer ser­vice indus­try con­nects cus­tomer loy­alty and employee sat­is­fac­tion. Case stud­ies and com­pany pro­files repeat­edly show that for employ­ees to pro­vide not just good cus­tomer service—but great cus­tomer service—they must first be dri­ven by loy­alty and enthu­si­asm from their employer. In other words, you can’t force devo­tion or com­mit­ment on your employ­ees, but you can fos­ter it by cre­at­ing a cul­ture that invites pride and own­er­ship in the job and company.

    To see the con­cept visu­ally, the below graph, cour­tesy of MetricNet’s research on call cen­ter met­rics, aptly illus­trates the con­nec­tion between employee sat­is­fac­tion and cus­tomer satisfaction:

    Prin­ci­ple #2: Cre­ate a great work environment

    So it makes sense that happy employ­ees make for hap­pier cus­tomers. The research backs up a fairly intu­itive con­cept. But to cre­ate an envi­ron­ment filled with smil­ing, customer-serving employ­ees, sim­ply offer­ing your agents a great park­ing spot if they are cho­sen as employee of the month isn’t going to cut it. Nei­ther is offer­ing $.25 cent sodas out of the com­pany soda machine. We could write a book on cre­at­ing a great work envi­ron­ment (actu­ally, we did!…and we wrote a train­ing pro­gram, too), but for brevity’s sake, let’s take the exam­ple of one com­pany, New Bel­gium Brew­ery in Col­orado, that has a 97% employee reten­tion rate. Why? The employ­ees, quite sim­ply, like their jobs. The happy staff at New Bel­gium are also pro­duc­tive, moti­vated employ­ees that sell a prod­uct cus­tomers like.

    What exactly makes New Bel­gium employ­ees so happy? Yes, they get to sam­ple the beer they pro­duce, but the man­age­ment at New Bel­gium has taken delib­er­ate steps to fos­ter a loyal work­force through the fol­low­ing principles:

    • Encour­age employ­ees to have own­er­ship: The employee-owned cul­ture at New Bel­gium means that employ­ees par­tic­i­pate in major decisions—they vote on every­thing from new tech­nol­ogy pur­chases to new staff positions.
    • Reward employ­ees for loy­alty: How about a custom-made cruiser bike after a year of ser­vice and a trip to Bel­gium after 5 years of ser­vice? (To name a few.)
    • Cre­ate poli­cies employ­ees can be proud of: The com­pany has a strict pol­icy of envi­ron­men­tal stew­ard­ship and does things such as turn­ing waste into live­stock feed and using wind-powered electricity.
    • Lead by exam­ple: The founders of New Bel­gium are com­mit­ted to sound busi­ness prac­tices and stew­ard­ship in their com­mu­nity. They believe in what their com­pany stands for, and they hire employ­ees who reflect the company’s values.

    Prin­ci­ple #3: Cre­ate an envi­ron­ment that encour­ages low turnover

    We’ve writ­ten pre­vi­ous posts about how cus­tomer ser­vice starts with your staff, and we’ve men­tioned the impor­tance of ade­quate employee screen­ing, train­ing, and pay­ing fair wages. It’s a topic worth repeating.

    Turnover, quite sim­ply, is expen­sive, a huge drain on time and com­pany resources, and leads to over­all low morale. There are many con­trib­u­tors to high turnover, includ­ing inad­e­quate train­ing, poor employee screen­ing meth­ods, and a rushed hir­ing process. If you think pay­ing lower wages will save your com­pany money in the long-run, first con­sider the costs of employee turnover. Accord­ing to recent data, replac­ing an employee can cost any­where from 30% to 150% of an employee’s annual salary and ben­e­fits. So if you have an employee mak­ing $40,000 a year, you could be pay­ing between $12,000 and $60,000 just to hire a replacement.

    Even with a focused cus­tomer ser­vice skills train­ing pro­gram, there are greater forces at play when improv­ing employee sat­is­fac­tion and cre­at­ing a cul­ture that dri­ves high cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion rates. If you, or other powers-at-be in the com­pany are down­play­ing the impor­tance of employee sat­is­fac­tion, exam­ine your employee cul­ture before attempt­ing to fix your cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion rates.

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    No Comments "

    Do Your Customers Make Unreasonable Demands?

    June 10th, 2011

    Whether or not you believe that "the cus­tomer is always right", it's true that some­times cus­tomers make unrea­son­able demands. So, what is the best way to deal with cus­tomers who make unrea­son­able demands?

    Start by using pos­i­tive lan­guage, telling the cus­tomer what you can do for them, rather than what you can't. Avoid slang and jar­gon and main­tain a pro­fes­sional tone of voice. Chal­leng­ing sit­u­a­tions demand even more from you—attitudinally speaking—than ordi­nary cus­tomer inter­ac­tions. Com­mon sense and a pos­i­tive atti­tude will help you stay calm while deal­ing with unrea­son­able cus­tomers. Here are a few addi­tional guide­lines to fol­low when deal­ing with chal­leng­ing cus­tomers and situations:

    1. Be Hum­ble. Even if the cus­tomer is wrong, is act­ing inappropriately,or is demand­ing a solu­tion you can't pro­vide, your strat­egy should be to pro­ceed with humil­ity. This sim­ple mea­sure puts the cus­tomer at ease and can change the direc­tion of the con­ver­sa­tion. Being hum­ble does not mean you have to apol­o­gize for some­thing that’s not your fault and it doesn't mean you have to get on your knees and grovel. It sim­ply means that you under­stand that your role is to serve cus­tomers, even if they are dif­fi­cult or unpleas­ant. Of course, if a sit­u­a­tion war­rants an apol­ogy, be sure to offer one.
    2. Express empa­thy.Empathiz­ing allows the cus­tomer to feel that you heard and under­stood his or her con­cern. This can go a long way in get­ting the customer’s coöper­a­tion that you need to resolve the sit­u­a­tion. Here are some ways to express empathy:
      • I can appreciate…
      • I can understand…
      • I know what you mean…
      • Yes, I wouldn’t like that too much either…
    3. Remain poised. Ulti­mately the very best thing you can do for both your­self and your cus­tomer is to remain poised, calm, and con­fi­dent. This allows you to focus on a solu­tion and shows the cus­tomer that you’ve got the sit­u­a­tion under con­trol. If you are upset, you’ll only aggra­vate the cus­tomer further.
    4. It is impor­tant to let the cus­tomer vent, at least briefly. In many cases, the oppor­tu­nity to express their frus­tra­tion is all cus­tomers need; then they’re ready to work with you on find­ing that solution.
    5. Focus on a solu­tion. If there is a prob­lem, don’t beat it to death. Some­times details such as why and when the prob­lem occurred are not impor­tant. The best rule is to focus as soon as pos­si­ble on find­ing a solu­tion. To do this, put aside the emo­tions, dis­cern the impor­tant details of the sit­u­a­tion, and focus on what CAN be done (instead of what CAN’T be done) to resolve the issue or problem.
    6. Avoid defen­sive­ness. Remem­ber that your job is to serve cus­tomers — even those who chal­lenge you — not to defend your­self against them. If a cus­tomer makes a dis­parag­ing remark, or blames you for the prob­lem, don’t take it per­son­ally. Stick to the facts and carry on with find­ing the solution.
    7. Be pro­fes­sional. Avoid slang and jar­gon and main­tain a calm tone of voice.

    If you are unable to ful­fill a demand­ing customer's request because of com­pany pol­icy or legal or eth­i­cal rea­sons, be sure to explain why you are unable to, show empa­thy, and let the cus­tomer know what you can do by pro­vid­ing an alter­nate solu­tion if there is one. By explain­ing why you’re not able to ful­fill a request, you help the cus­tomer to under­stand and accept the sit­u­a­tion. Avoid giv­ing a dry, rote, “That’s not our pol­icy.” Instead, speak in a pos­i­tive, con­fi­dent tone of voice, and explain why you are not able to ful­fill the request. It is espe­cially impor­tant to incor­po­rate the above-mentioned guide­lines when say­ing no.

    It's impor­tant to rec­og­nize that appro­pri­ately han­dling cus­tomer demands has direct effects on cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion, cus­tomer loy­alty, and the cus­tomer expe­ri­ence. Just because cus­tomers may be per­ceived by you to be irra­tional or unrea­son­ably demand­ing, your job is still to help find a solu­tion. If you fol­low these guide­lines, you'll be more likely to con­clude the call with a sat­is­fied customer.

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    No Comments "

    Average Handle Time — Does It Matter?

    June 7th, 2011

    Met­rics. Num­bers. Data. If you feel inun­dated by num­bers and are won­der­ing how to sort through the var­i­ous met­rics you need to be track­ing for a call cen­ter or your cus­tomer ser­vice depart­ment, you’re cer­tainly not alone.  In this post, we’re going to dis­cuss aver­age han­dle time, specif­i­cally, and give you the ins and outs of what it’s used for, when to apply it, and how to improve your aver­age han­dle time numbers.

    Straight­for­ward and simple

    The aver­age han­dle time sim­ply tracks how long calls last (called talk time) and how much time is spent in the post-call wrap-up (called wrap time). Typ­i­cally, a low aver­age han­dle time is seen as pos­i­tive and indi­cates effi­ciency. And, among the other met­rics typ­i­cally tracked, such as first-call res­o­lu­tion, esca­la­tion rates, or even the cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion score (CSAT), aver­age han­dle time is much more straightforward—it sim­ply aver­ages the amount of time spent help­ing callers over a spe­cific num­ber of calls.

    Fore­cast­ing: Aver­age Han­dle Time + Vol­ume = Call Load

    Aver­age han­dle time is pop­u­lar because it is so straight­for­ward, and it seems to be a clear indi­ca­tor of effi­ciency, but per­haps the bet­ter use of the met­ric is for fore­cast­ing the work­load at a call cen­ter. By com­bin­ing the aver­age han­dle time with call vol­ume, you will arrive at your call load, which serves as a use­ful guide for plan­ning and man­age­ment purposes.

    Great. So reduce aver­age han­dle time, be able to fore­cast, and reduce costs, right?

    Not so fast. Mea­sur­ing aver­age han­dle time is indeed imper­a­tive for fore­cast­ing, and by mak­ing your call cen­ter more effi­cient, you will see reduced costs and (hope­fully) a rise in prof­itabil­ity, but if you are solely focused on being quick and effi­cient, you may be sac­ri­fic­ing qual­ity. In par­tic­u­lar, if you have a cen­ter han­dling com­plex issues and a sec­ondary goal is to build rela­tion­ships with your cus­tomers, cap­ture addi­tional infor­ma­tion, or cre­ate add-on sales, then sim­ply try­ing to drive down your aver­age han­dle time could work against your organization’s over­all goals (and the ever-important CSAT score).

    Be cau­tious, there­fore, if you really push aver­age han­dle time or incen­tivize your rep­re­sen­ta­tives to keep the num­ber low. In doing so, they may miss chances to cross-sell, up-sell, or build rap­port with the customer.

    Focus on the process, not sim­ply the result

    So where does this leave us? Focus­ing on aver­age han­dle time does seem impor­tant, but we’ve also advised not to rely on the met­ric too much and jeop­ar­dize call qual­ity. Like most con­tact cen­ter met­rics, aver­age han­dle time is a depen­dent vari­able that works in con­junc­tion with other processes in place. When you focus sim­ply on con­trol­ling one ele­ment of ser­vice, such as aver­age han­dle time, you can throw a wrench in other, equally impor­tant steps. How­ever, by tak­ing a holis­tic view of the com­plete process—from your over­all cus­tomer ser­vice strat­egy goals to your cus­tomer ser­vice train­ing process and all of the met­rics that you use to mon­i­tor your cen­ter, you’ll start to see pat­terns and be able to fix the under­ly­ing issues with­out jeop­ar­diz­ing your over­all cus­tomer service.

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    1 Comment "

    The Foundation of Customer Satisfaction? Teach Your Team to Build Rapport

    June 3rd, 2011

    The num­bers are in—the edict has been passed down through the chan­nels and the ball is now in your court. “Increase cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion scores.” Or, “Drive more sales.” Or, the neb­u­lous “Build bet­ter rap­port with cus­tomers.” Sound famil­iar? If your job involves man­ag­ing a call cen­ter staff, undoubt­edly, you face pres­sure to do bet­ter and moti­vate your staff to be more per­sonal, or more helpful—whatever that “key” ele­ment is that your rep­re­sen­ta­tives need to do in order to increase cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion and sales.

    So what’s miss­ing? What is the secret ele­ment that your rep­re­sen­ta­tives seem to be miss­ing when deal­ing with cus­tomers? You under­stand that, ulti­mately, to increase cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion, your staff needs to con­nect with cus­tomers and build rap­port, but how do you make build­ing rap­port a real­ity and actu­ally train your staff to be effective?

    Iden­tify the under­ly­ing motivation

    At the heart of every call placed to a cus­tomer ser­vice or sup­port line is an under­ly­ing need to resolve an issue, to gather infor­ma­tion, or to com­plete a step in a process (for exam­ple, call­ing to have credit approved for a loan). It goes with­out say­ing, in other words, that peo­ple don’t sim­ply call a company’s help or sup­port line because they want to chat.

    Whether the moti­va­tion to place a call is to avoid a has­sle, or to take a pos­i­tive step, you first need to train your staff to rec­og­nize and work with the emo­tional dri­ver behind the call. Are callers moti­vated to move away from a has­sle (for exam­ple a non-functioning copy machine), or toward a pos­i­tive out­come (for exam­ple, sign­ing up for the­ater tick­ets). By ask­ing your cus­tomer ser­vice rep­re­sen­ta­tives to iden­tify and start with the core moti­va­tion your callers present, your staff will begin the call with appro­pri­ate goal and tone in mind.

    For exam­ple, if you oper­ate a credit card sup­port cen­ter, you prob­a­bly deal with a lot of callers who are late with a pay­ment or who are call­ing to dis­pute a trans­ac­tion. The tone your staff needs to estab­lish is there­fore, “Let’s help you solve your finan­cial issue eas­ily and ease your stress.” On the other end of the spec­trum, if your com­pany offers home financ­ing, and your callers reach out to you to move toward a pos­i­tive out­come, your staff will need to estab­lish a tone that projects “Great! Let’s help you get your financ­ing approved so you can find that dream home.”

    Robots don’t build rapport

    If your call cen­ter rep­re­sen­ta­tives work from a script—as many do—it can be easy for a call to sound like a con­ver­sa­tion between a per­son and a robot. How­ever, even with a script, it’s impor­tant to still encour­age your staff to act nat­u­rally and be con­ver­sa­tional, warm, and per­sonal with cus­tomers. Remember—your cus­tomer rep­re­sen­ta­tives are often the only human aspect of your com­pany that many peo­ple will have con­tact with, so encour­age your rep­re­sen­ta­tives to use the script as a guide­line for points to cover in the call, but not to rely on the script as their only means of con­ver­sa­tion and inter­ac­tion with the customer.

    The “mir­ror” example

    A great anal­ogy to help build rap­port is to have your staff think of a mir­ror when they speak with a customer—reflect back the tone, lan­guage, pace, and action of the per­son they’re speak­ing with. Stud­ies have found that you build rap­port rapidly when you use mutual lan­guage. By para­phras­ing and using the cho­sen lan­guage of the per­son you’re com­mu­ni­cat­ing with, it’s eas­ier to estab­lish trust and build rapport.

    Now, obvi­ously, if your rep­re­sen­ta­tive has an irate cus­tomer who is rude, uses foul lan­guage, or has a harsh tone, mir­ror­ing does not mean that your rep­re­sen­ta­tive should match the caller’s tone. By “mir­ror­ing,” we mean that you should teach your staff to use the same words (for exam­ple if a cus­tomer says “credit card state­ment,” your rep­re­sen­ta­tive should use the word “state­ment” instead of “credit card bill”) and gen­eral pace of the cus­tomer. Some cus­tomers will be very non-engaging and want the call to be brief and to the point. Oth­ers may enjoy chat­ting and desire small talk. Advise your staff to take into account words, tone, and the customer’s pace.

    Build rap­port through listening

    Do you know what most peo­ple are inter­ested in? Them­selves and their prob­lems. It may sound self­ish, but espe­cially in the con­text of a cus­tomer sup­port cen­ter call, peo­ple do not call you because they want to hear more about your prod­ucts. Cus­tomers call you because they want to talk about their needs and because they want their issue resolved.

    By teach­ing your staff to lis­ten to your cus­tomers—truly lis­ten to your customers—your cus­tomers will come away from the call feel­ing val­i­dated and respected. Keep in mind that true lis­ten­ing involves more than not talking—listening means that you keep your mind focused on what the cus­tomer is say­ing, para­phrase back to the cus­tomer what you hear, and are able to for­mu­late a solu­tion or guide the cus­tomer based on what you hear them say. If you can help your staff mas­ter the skill of atten­tive lis­ten­ing, you’ll be well on the way to build­ing cus­tomer rapport.

    Explain the question

    Finally, to help build rap­port, teach your staff to “explain the ques­tion.” Cus­tomers appre­ci­ate know­ing why and what you’re doing with the infor­ma­tion you ask. So if your rep­re­sen­ta­tive asks for a customer’s address, have them explain why the address is necessary—“Can I have your address so I can con­firm that your account infor­ma­tion is up-to-date,” for exam­ple. By tak­ing that sim­ple step of adding the “so that I can …” you won’t come off as though you’re inter­ro­gat­ing the customer—you’ll instead project that you value them, and your cus­tomers will be more recep­tive to pro­vid­ing the requested information.

    Build­ing rap­port – a win-win

    Build­ing rap­port with cus­tomers is a multi-faceted process, but by invest­ing the time and train­ing, you will be tak­ing pos­i­tive steps to make your cus­tomers feel val­ued. Val­ued cus­tomers are sat­is­fied customers—and that’s a win-win for you, your cus­tomer, your com­pany, and your numbers.

    If you are inter­ested in learn­ing more about build­ing rap­port and improv­ing cus­tomer sat­is­fac­tion, , Impact Learn­ing Sys­tems offers train­ing pro­grams that get to the heart of cus­tomer ser­vice and result in mea­sur­able pos­i­tive out­comes for companies.

    Share and Enjoy:
    • Print
    • email
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Technorati

    1 Comment "